Efficacy and safety of follitropin delta for ovarian stimulation in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Follitropin delta is a novel recombinant follicle stimulating hormone preparation uniquely expressed in a human fetal retinal cell line by recombinant DNA technology. To date, no systematic review was available about the safety and the efficacy of the follitropin delta. The objective of this study was systematically reviewing the available literature and to provide updated evidence regarding the efficacy-safety profile of follitropin delta when compared to other gonadotropin formulations for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. METHODS: An extensive search was performed to identify phase 1, phase 2 and phase 3 RCTs in humans focused on follitropin delta use for ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles. The risk of bias and the overall quality of the evidence was analyzed. All data were extracted and analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle and expressed per woman randomized. RESULTS: A total of 7 RCTs (1 phase 1 RCT, 2 phase 2 RCTs and 4 phase 3 RCTs) were included in the qualitative analysis, whereas data of three phase 3 RCTs were meta-analyzed. All trials compared personalized recombinant follitropin delta treatment versus conventional recombinant follitropin alfa/beta administration in potentially normo-responder patients who receive ovarian stimulation in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles. No difference between two regimens was detected for clinical pregnancy rate [odds ratio (OR) 1.06; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.90, 1.24; P = 0.49; I2 = 26%], ongoing pregnancy rate (OR 1.15; 95%CI: 0.90, 1.46; P = 0.27; I2 = 40%), and live birth rate (OR 1.18; 95%CI: 0.89, 1.55; P = 0.25; I2 = 55%). No data were available regarding cumulative success rates. The rate of adoption of strategies to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) development (OR 0.45; 95%CI: 0.30, 0.66; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0%), and the rate of both early OHSS (OR 0.62; 95%CI: 0.43, 0.88; P = 0.008; I2 = 0%) and all forms of OHSS (OR 0.61; 95%CI: 0.44, 0.84; P = 0.003; I2 = 0%) were significantly lower in the group of patients treated with personalized follitropin delta treatment compared to those treated with conventional follitropin alfa/beta administration. CONCLUSION: Personalized follitropin delta treatment is associated with a lower risk of OHSS compared to conventional follitropin alfa/beta administration in potentially normo-responder patients who receive ovarian stimulation in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles. The absence of cumulative data does not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn regarding the comparison of the effectiveness of the two treatments. PROTOCOL STUDY REGISTRATION: CRD42023470352 (available at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ).

[Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with controlled ovarian stimulation after induction therapy for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

A 27-year-old woman with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia received induction therapy with dasatinib and prednisolone. From the time of diagnosis, oocyte storage was planned in accordance with the patient's wishes. After progesterone administration for suppression of menstruation, and blood cell recovery, ovarian stimulation was performed and a sufficient number of eggs was collected. The patient was considered at high risk for ovarian stimulation syndrome (OHSS) and received cabergoline and letrozole. However, ovarian enlargement and ascites were observed on ultrasonography 2 days after egg collection, and a diagnosis of moderate OHSS was made. Circulatory management was performed and low-molecular-weight heparin was administered. Dasatinib was discontinued due to the appearance of pleural effusion. Fluid retention improved after menstruation resumed, and the patient was able to continue consolidation with dasatinib and cord blood transplantation. Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors are expected to simplify planning of oocyte storage, the risk of complicating OHSS should be noted.

Age at menarche and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the association between age at menarche (AAM) and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in fresh in vitro fertilisation (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Data were collected from a large obstetrics and gynaecology hospital in Sichuan, China. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 17 419 eligible women aged ≤40 years who underwent the first IVF/ICSI cycles from January 2015 to December 2021. Women were divided into three groups according to their AAM: ≤12 years (n=5781), 13-14 years (n=9469) and ≥15 years (n=2169). RESULTS: The means of age at recruitment and AAM were 30.4 years and 13.1 years, respectively. Restricted cubic spline models suggested that early menarche age increased the risk of OHSS. The multivariable logistic analysis showed that women with menarche age ≤12 years were more likely to suffer from OHSS (OR 1.321, 95% CI 1.113 to 1.567) compared with those aged 13-14 years among the whole cohort. This significant relationship remained in women administered with different ovarian stimulation protocols and gonadotrophin doses. When stratified by female age, this correlation was presented only in patients aged ≤30 years (OR 1.362, 95% CI 1.094 to 1.694). And the mediation analysis showed that the relationship between AAM and OHSS was totally mediated by antral follicle counts (AFC). CONCLUSION: Menarche age earlier than 12 years may increase the OHSS risk in women aged ≤30 years through the mediation of AFC. More prospective studies are required to verify the results.

Comparison between hCG and GnRH Agonist for Ovulation Trigger in GnRH Antagonist In-Vitro Fertilization Cycles in a Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia: An observational study.

OBJECTIVE: hCG is commonly used as an ovulation trigger in IVF. Its usage is associated with OHSS. GnRH agonist is an alternative to hCG and is associated with reduced incidence of OHSS. This study compared the cycle outcomes of GnRH agonists with hCG as an ovulation trigger in IVF cycles. METHODS: The medical notes of 209 IVF cycles receiving GnRH agonist and hCG as ovulation trigger over 18 months were reviewed in this retrospective study. The number and quality of mature oocytes, the number and quality of embryos, pregnancy rates, and outcomes were compared using Independent T-test or One-way ANOVA for normal distribution. The Mann-Whitney test or Kruskal-Wallis test was used for not normally distributed. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The cycle outcomes of 107 GnRH agonist-trigger and 102 hCG-trigger were compared. The MII oocytes retrieved and 2PN count was significantly higher in the GnRH agonist trigger group (p<0.001). Clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy were higher in the GnRH agonist trigger group but were not statistically significant. The GnRH agonist trigger group was associated with low OHSS than the hCG trigger group (n=2(1.9%) and n=12(11.8%) respectively, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: GnRH agonist trigger is an option as a final maturation trigger in high-responder women undergoing IVF or ICSI cycles.

Serum erythropoietin level is increased during stimulation for IVF but not in OHSS.

BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin (Epo) is a potent vascular growth factor that induces angiogenesis and antiapoptotic signalling. We investigated whether the development of numerous follicles and corpora lutea during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle affects circulating Epo levels and further, if Epo could be used as a novel marker for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). METHODS: 24 women were included in the uncomplicated IVF group and 35 women in the OHSS group. Repeated blood samples from both groups were analysed for Epo, progesterone, blood haemoglobin, and creatinine. Follicular fluid from the IVF group was analysed for Epo and progesterone. Repeated measure analysis was performed for the variables and circulating Epo levels were compared between the IVF group and early OHSS. Furthermore, related growth factors, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) were analysed from subgroup of women to test for correlation with Epo. RESULTS: During IVF, circulating Epo increased from natural mid-luteal phase to stimulated mid-luteal phase (median 9.5; 95% CI 7.2-13.4 IU/L and 12.5; 10.3-13.4 IU/L; p = 0.003). In cycles resulting in pregnancy, Epo level decreased 14 days after oocyte pick-up (OPU) and remained low thereafter. In cycles not resulting in pregnancy, Epo level increased again 35 days after OPU. Follicle fluid Epo concentration was 1.5 times higher than the serum concentration (median 15.4; 95% CI 10.4-19.2 IU/L vs. 10.2; 8.8-12.7; p = 0.006). There was no difference in circulating Epo concentration between early OHSS and uncomplicated IVF. Circulating Epo did not correlate with VEGF or HIF-1. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating Epo levels fluctuate during IVF cycle. We hypothesise this may suggest Epo's involvement in ovarian physiology and angiogenesis. However, Epo was not a clinical marker for OHSS.

Personalizing the first dose of FSH for IVF/ICSI patients through machine learning: a non-inferiority study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Adequately selecting the initial follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dose during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is key for success in assisted reproduction. The objective of COS is to obtain an optimal number of oocytes to increase the chances of achieving a pregnancy, while avoiding complications for the patient. Current clinical protocols do achieve good results for the majority of patients, but further refinements in individualized FSH dosing may reduce the risk of poor ovarian response while also limiting the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk. Models to select the first FSH dose in COS have been presented in literature with promising results. However, most have only been developed and tested in normo-ovulatory women under the age of 40 years. METHODS: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, single blinded, clinical trial. This study will be performed in 236 first cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) patients, randomized 1:1 in two arms. In the intervention arm, the dose of FSH will be assigned by a machine learning (ML) model called IDoser, while in the control arm, the dose will be determined by the clinician following standard practice. Stratified block randomization will be carried out depending on the patient being classified as expected low responder, high responder, or normo-responder. Patients will complete their participation in the trial once the first embryo transfer result is known. The primary outcome of the study is the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved at ovarian pick up (OPU) and the hypothesis of non-inferiority of the intervention arm compared to the control. Secondary outcomes include the number of cycle cancelations (due to low response or no retrieval of mature oocytes), risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per first transfer. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to test clinical performance of an all-patient inclusive model to select the first dose of FSH for COS. Prospective trials for machine learning (ML) models in healthcare are scarce but necessary for clinical application. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05948293 . Registered on 14 July 2023.

Follitropin delta combined with menotropin in patients at risk for poor ovarian response during in vitro fertilization cycles: a prospective controlled clinical study.

BACKGROUND: The maximum daily dose of follitropin delta for ovarian stimulation in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is 12 µg (180 IU), according to the algorithm developed by the manufacturer, and based on patient's ovarian reserve and weight. This study aimed to assess whether 150 IU of menotropin combined with follitropin delta improves the response to stimulation in women with serum antimullerian hormone levels less than 2.1 ng/mL. METHODS: This study involved a prospective intervention group of 44 women who received 12 µg of follitropin delta combined with 150 IU of menotropin from the beginning of stimulation and a retrospective control group of 297 women who received 12 µg of follitropin delta alone during the phase 3 study of this drug. The inclusion and exclusion criteria and other treatment and follow-up protocols in the two groups were similar. The pituitary suppression was achieved by administering a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. Ovulation triggering with human chorionic gonadotropin or GnRH agonist and the option of transferring fresh embryos or using freeze-all strategy were made according to the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. RESULTS: Women who received follitropin delta combined with menotropin had higher estradiol levels on trigger day (2150 pg/mL vs. 1373 pg/mL, p < 0.001), more blastocysts (3.1 vs. 2.4, p = 0.003) and more top-quality blastocysts (1.8 vs. 1.3, p = 0.017). No difference was observed in pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, and live birth rates after the first embryo transfer. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome did not differ between the groups. However, preventive measures for the syndrome were more frequent in the group using both drugs than in the control group (13.6% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In women with serum antimullerian hormone levels less than 2.1 ng/mL, the administration of 150 IU of menotropin combined with 12 µg of follitropin delta improved the ovarian response, making it a valid therapeutic option in situations where ovulation triggering with a GnRH agonist and freeze-all embryos strategy can be used routinely. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U1111-1247-3260 (Brazilian Register of Clinical Trials, available at https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-2kmyfm ).

Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

BACKGROUND: During a stimulated cycle of in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI), women receive daily doses of gonadotropin follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) to induce multifollicular development in the ovaries. A normal response to stimulation (e.g. retrieval of 5 to 15 oocytes) is considered desirable. Generally, the number of eggs retrieved is associated with the dose of FSH. Both hyper-response and poor response are associated with an increased chance of cycle cancellation. In hyper-response, this is due to increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), while poor response cycles are cancelled because the quantity and quality of oocytes is expected to be low. Clinicians often individualise the FSH dose using patient characteristics predictive of ovarian response. Traditionally, this meant women's age, but increasingly, clinicians use various ovarian reserve tests (ORTs). These include basal FSH (bFSH), antral follicle count (AFC), and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). It is unclear whether individualising FSH dose improves clinical outcomes. This review updates the 2018 version. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve in women undergoing IVF/ICSI. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trial registers in February 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared (a) different doses of FSH in women with a defined ORT profile (i.e. predicted low, normal, or high responders based on AMH, AFC, and/or bFSH) or (b) an individualised dosing strategy (based on at least one ORT measure) versus uniform dosing or a different individualised dosing algorithm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Primary outcomes were live birth/ongoing pregnancy and severe OHSS. MAIN RESULTS: We included 26 studies, involving 8520 women (6 new studies added to 20 studies included in the previous version). We treated RCTs with multiple comparisons as separate trials for the purpose of this review. Meta-analysis was limited due to clinical heterogeneity. Evidence certainty ranged from very low to low, with the main limitations being imprecision and risk of bias associated with lack of blinding. Direct dose comparisons according to predicted response in women Due to differences in dose comparisons, caution is required when interpreting the RCTs in predicted low responders. All evidence was low or very low certainty. Effect estimates were very imprecise, and increased FSH dosing may or may not have an impact on rates of live birth/ongoing pregnancy, OHSS, and clinical pregnancy. Similarly, in predicted normal responders (10 studies, 4 comparisons), higher doses may or may not impact the probability of live birth/ongoing pregnancy (e.g. 200 versus 100 international units (IU): odds ratio (OR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 1.36; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 522 women) or clinical pregnancy. Results were imprecise, and a small benefit or harm remains possible. There were too few events for the OHSS outcome to enable inferences. In predicted high responders, lower doses may or may not affect live birth/ongoing pregnancy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.46; 1 study, 521 women), severe OHSS, and clinical pregnancy. It is also unclear whether lower doses reduce moderate or severe OHSS (Peto OR 2.31, 95% CI 0.80 to 6.67; 1 study, 521 participants). ORT-algorithm studies Eight trials compared an ORT-based algorithm to a non-ORT control group. It is unclear whether live birth/ongoing pregnancy and clinical pregnancy are increased using an ORT-based algorithm (live birth/ongoing pregnancy: OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.29; I2 = 30%; 7 studies, 4400 women; clinical pregnancy: OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.18; I2 = 18%; 7 studies, 4400 women; low-certainty evidence). However, ORT algorithms may reduce moderate or severe OHSS (Peto OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.84; I2 = 0%; 7 studies, 4400 women; low-certainty evidence). There was insufficient evidence to determine whether the groups differed in rates of severe OHSS (Peto OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.28; I2 = 0%; 5 studies, 2724 women; low-certainty evidence). Our findings suggest that if the chance of live birth with a standard starting dose is 25%, the chance with ORT-based dosing would be between 25% and 31%. If the chance of moderate or severe OHSS with a standard starting dose is 5%, the chance with ORT-based dosing would be between 2% and 5%. These results should be treated cautiously due to heterogeneity in the algorithms: some algorithms appear to be more effective than others. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We did not find that tailoring the FSH dose in any particular ORT population (low, normal, high ORT) affected live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates, but we could not rule out differences, due to sample size limitations. Low-certainty evidence suggests that it is unclear if ORT-based individualisation leads to an increase in live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates compared to a policy of giving all women 150 IU. The confidence interval is consistent with an increase of up to around six percentage points with ORT-based dosing (e.g. from 25% to 31%) or a very small decrease (< 1%). A difference of this magnitude could be important to many women. It is unclear if this is driven by improved outcomes in a particular subgroup. Further, ORT algorithms reduced the incidence of OHSS compared to standard dosing of 150 IU. However, the size of the effect is also unclear. The included studies were heterogeneous in design, which limited the interpretation of pooled estimates. It is likely that different ORT algorithms differ in their effectiveness. Current evidence does not provide a clear justification for adjusting the dose of 150 IU in poor or normal responders, especially as increased dose is associated with greater total FSH dose and cost. It is unclear whether a decreased dose in predicted high responders reduces OHSS, although this would appear to be the most likely explanation for the results.

Outpatient paracentesis for the management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: study protocol for the STOP-OHSS randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most significant short-term complication of pharmacological ovarian stimulation. Symptoms range from mild abdominal discomfort to rare complications such as renal failure, thromboembolism and respiratory distress syndrome.Currently, clinical practice typically involves monitoring the patient until the condition becomes severe, at which point they are admitted to hospital, where drainage of ascitic fluid (paracentesis) may take place. Preliminary studies have indicated that earlier outpatient paracentesis may reduce the progression of OHSS and prevent hospitalisation in women. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This UK, multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group, adaptive (group sequential with one interim analysis), open-label, superiority, confirmatory, group sequential, individually randomised controlled trial, with internal pilot will assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness and safety of outpatient paracentesis versus conservative management (usual care) for moderate or severe OHSS. 224 women from 20 National Health Service and private fertility units will be randomised (1:1) and followed up for up to 13.5 months. The primary outcome is the rate of OHSS related hospital admission of at least 24 hours within 28 days postrandomisation. The primary analysis will be an intention to treat with difference in hospitalisation rates as measure of treatment effect. Secondary outcomes include time to resolution of symptoms, patient satisfaction, adverse events and cost-effectiveness. A qualitative substudy will facilitate the feasibility of recruitment. Participant recruitment commenced in June 2022. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: London-Southeast Research Ethics Committee approved the protocol (reference: 22/LO/0015). Findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and abstracts to relevant national and international conferences, as well as being disseminated to trial participants and patient groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN71978064.

LH on GnRH-ant day to basal LH affects the IVF/ICSI outcome of PCOS women undergoing GnRH-antagonist protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of ratio of serum luteinizing hormone (LH) on gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) day to basal LH (hLH/bLH) on in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) outcome in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women who received GnRH-ant protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in women with PCOS (n = 1116) who underwent the GnRH-ant protocol for COH between 2015 and 2022 and were stratified as group A (hLH/bLH < 1, n = 489) and group B (hLH/bLH ≥ 1, n = 627) according to the variation of serum LH. The outcomes of COH and the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle were compared between group A, B and the linear relationship between hLH/bLH ratio and IVF/ICSI outcomes were studied by multivariate linear regression analysis and restricted cubic spline (RCS) models. RESULTS: There were significant differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes between group A and B. Group A had higher levels of bLH, AMH, estradiol (E2) on GnRH-ant start day and lower levels of LH on GnRH-ant start day. Group B has better ovulation induction outcomes: more retrieved oocytes, normally fertilized oocytes (2PN), cleavage embryos, available embryos and high-quality blastocysts. Multivariate linear regression analysis found no statistically significant connection between hLH/bLH and clinical outcomes. RCS models showed hLH/bLH had nonlinear association with outcomes, including number of oocytes retrieved, 2PN, available embryos, incidence of OHSS, chemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, abortion and live birth. CONCLUSIONS: hLH/bLH ratio could be a more forward-looking indicator of clinical outcome in women with PCOS undergoing GnRH-ant protocols than LH on trigger day and the ratio of LH level on trigger day to basal LH. hLH/bLH = 1 may be the best condition for higher live birth rate and lower OHSS rate.

Effect of GnRH agonist trigger with or without low-dose hCG on reproductive outcomes for PCOS women with freeze-all strategy: a propensity score matching study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger alone versus dual trigger comprising GnRHa and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on reproductive outcomes in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who received the freeze-all strategy. METHODS: A total of 615 cycles were included in this retrospective cohort study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control potential confounding factors between GnRHa-trigger group (0.2 mg GnRHa) and dual-trigger group (0.2 mg GnRHa plus 1000/2000 IU hCG) in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to estimate the association between trigger methods and reproductive outcomes. RESULTS: After PSM, patients with dual trigger (n = 176) had more oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, and 2PN embryos compared to that with GnRHa trigger alone. However, the oocytes maturation rate, normal fertilization rate, and frozen embryos between the two groups were not statistically different. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (14.8% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001) and moderate/severe OHSS (11.4% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in dual-trigger group than in GnRHa-alone group. Logistic regression analysis showed the adjusted odds ratio of dual trigger was 5.971 (95% confidence interval 2.201-16.198, P < 0.001) for OHSS. The pregnancy and single neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: For PCOS women with freeze-all strategy, GnRHa trigger alone decreased the risk of OHSS without damaging oocyte maturation and achieved satisfactory pregnancy outcomes.

First case report of serous otitis media as a complication of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: Case report and literature review.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) may be a severe complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during assisted reproductive technology. During OHSS, fluid shifts from the intravascular space to the third-space compartments as the result of an increase in capillary permeability. This can cause fluid accumulation in peritoneal as well as thoracic cavities. The patient presented with symptoms of severe OHSS (bilateral hydrothorax and pulmonary effusion), requiring bilateral ultrasound-guided paracentesis and bilateral thoracentesis during her Emergency Room visits and hospitalization. Due to distant effects from the increased capillary permeability, the patient presented fluid in the middle ear, which led to the development of serous otitis media 12 days after egg retrieval. This was resolved 2-3 weeks later after being treated with antihistamines and antibiotics given by her Ear, Nose, and Throat doctor. OHSS risk may be reduced by continuous monitoring of patients undergoing ovulation induction, using an appropriate gonadotropin dosage, and using additional agents known to decrease its risk. If OHSS still occurs, symptomatic treatment and a multidisciplinary team of professionals may be needed to prevent fluid build-up complications. In contrast to many published articles about OHSS and its complications, this is the first case report of a patient presenting serous otitis media as a complication of severe OHSS.

Assisted Reproductive Technology in the Presence of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Current Evidence and Knowledge Gaps.

OBJECTIVE: In this narrative review, we discuss the current evidence as well as the knowledge gaps concerning assisted reproductive technology (ART) indications, protocols, and results in the presence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed for English-language publications in the last decade in databases such as PubMed, Medline, the Web of Sciences, Embase, and Scopus. RESULTS: We found evidence that ovarian steroidogenesis and folliculogenesis are deeply altered by PCOS; however, the oocyte quality and pregnancy rates after ART are not affected. Patients with PCOS are more sensitive to the action of exogenous gonadotropins and more likely to develop ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. This risk can be mitigated by the adoption of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocols for pituitary blockade and ovarian stimulation, along with frozen embryo transfer, without compromising the odds of achieving a live birth. Pregnancy complications, such as miscarriage, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and very preterm birth, are more frequent in the presence of PCOS, requiring more intense prenatal care. It remains uncertain whether weight reduction or insulin sensitizers used before ART are beneficial for the treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although PCOS is not a drawback for ART treatments, the patients need special care to avoid complications. More in-depth studies are needed to uncover the mechanisms of follicular growth, gamete maturation, and endometrial differentiation during ART procedures in the presence of PCOS.

TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß3, but not TGF-ß2, are upregulated in the ovaries of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome†.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a life-threatening and potentially fatal complication during in vitro fertilization treatment. The levels of transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) are upregulated in human follicular fluid and granulosa-lutein cells (hGL) of OHSS patients and could contribute to the development of OHSS by downregulating steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) expression. However, whether the same is true for the other two members of the TGF-ß family, TGF-ß2 and -ß3, remains unknown. We showed that all three TGF-ß isoforms were expressed in human follicular fluid. In comparison, TGF-ß1 was expressed at the highest level, followed by TGF-ß2 and TGF-ß3. Compared to non-OHSS patients, follicular fluid levels of TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß3 were significantly upregulated in OHSS patients. The same results were observed in mRNA levels of TGF-ß isoforms in hGL cells and ovaries of OHSS rats. In addition, StAR mRNA levels were upregulated in hGL cells of OHSS patients and the ovaries of OHSS rats. Treatment cells with TGF-ß isoforms downregulated the StAR expression with a comparable effect. Moreover, activations of SMAD3 signaling were required for TGF-ß isoforms-induced downregulation of StAR expression. This study indicates that follicular fluid TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß3 levels could be used as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the OHSS.

Prevention of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a guideline.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a serious complication associated with assisted reproductive technology. This systematic review aims to identify who is at high risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, along with evidence-based strategies to prevent it and replaces the document of the same name last published in 2016.

Prospective multicenter observational real-world study to assess the use, efficacy and safety profile of follitropin delta during IVF/ICSI procedures (DELTA Study).

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use, efficacy and safety profile of follitropin delta in women undergoing IVF/ICSI in routine clinical practice after one treatment cycle. STUDY DESIGN: This was a French multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted in 14 fertility centers between June 2020 and June 2021. During this period, 248 women undergoing IVF or ICSI were treated with follitropin delta for the first time. Women were followed up to 10-11 weeks after the first fresh or frozen embryo transfer. The main outcomes were use of dosing algorithm, follitropin delta dosing patterns, ovarian response, pregnancy, and adverse drug reactions in routine clinical practice. RESULTS: The analyzable population consisted of 223 patients with mean ± SD age of 33.0 ± 4.4 years, body weight of 65.7 ± 11.8 kg, and the median (IQR) AMH level was 2.6 (1.5-4.0) ng/mL. For 193 patients (86.5 %) it was the first IVF/ICSI cycle and for 30 (13.5 %) the second. The algorithm was used for the calculation of the starting dose for 88.3 % of the patients. The mean daily starting dose of follitropin delta was 11.4 ± 4.1mcg for the whole analyzable population and 14.4 ± 5.2 mcg for the sub-group of 26 patients dosed without the algorithm. The mean duration of stimulation with follitropin delta was 10.8 ± 5.2 days. The mean total dose of follitropin delta administered was 122.2 ± 80.0 mcg. An antagonist protocol was used in 90.3 % of patients. The mean ± SD number of oocytes retrieved among patients that started stimulation was 11.3 ± 6.8 and 46.1 % of patients achieved the targeted response of the algorithm of 8-14 oocytes retrieved. A fresh transfer was performed for 77.6 % of patients; the mean ± SD number of embryos transferred was 1.3 ± 0.5. The implantation rate was 36.0 %. Per started cycle, clinical pregnancy was reported in 35.0 % of the patients and ongoing pregnancy in 29.6 %. In total, 5 patients (2.2 %) reported an event of OHSS. CONCLUSION: Clinical results as collected in routine clinical practice are promising, showing a favorable effectiveness-safety profile of follitropin delta for a very varied patient population (including anovulatory PCOS, very poor responders, or non-IVF naïve patients). These real-world data complement results from clinical trials and provide useful information for usual clinical practice within a heterogeneous population group.

hMG addition affects the change in progesterone level during IVF stimulation and LBR: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Premature progesterone (P) rise during IVF stimulation reduces endometrial receptivity and is associated with lower pregnancy rates following embryo transfer (ET), which can influence provider recommendation for fresh or frozen ET. This study aimed to determine whether change in P level between in IVF baseline and trigger (𝚫P) is predictive of pregnancy outcome following fresh ET, and whether the ratio of gonadotropins influences P rise and, as a result, clinical pregnancy outcomes: clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study at a single fertility center at an academic institution. The peak P level and 𝚫P were modeled in relation to prediction of CPR and LBR, and the ratios of hMG:rFSH were also modeled in relation to prediction of peak P level on day of trigger, 𝚫P, and CPR/LBR in a total of 291 patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation-IVF (COH-IVF). RESULTS: 𝚫P correlates with CPR, with the most predictive range for success as 𝚫P 0.7-0.85 ng/mL (p = 0.005, 95% CI 0.635, 3.636; predicting CPR of 88.9%). The optimal range for peak P in regard to pregnancy outcome was 0.15-1.349 ng/mL (p = 0.01; 95% CI for coefficient in model 0.48-3.570). A multivariable logistic model for prediction of CPR and LBR using either peak or 𝚫P supported a stronger association between 𝚫P and CPR/LBR as compared to peak P. Furthermore, an hMG:rFSH ratio of > 0.6 was predictive of lowest peak P (p = 0.010, 95% CI 0.035, 0.256) and smallest 𝚫P (p = 0.012, 95% CI 0.030, 0.243) during COH-IVF cycles. Highest CPRs were observed within hMG:rFSH ratios of 0.3-0.4 [75.6% vs. 62.5% within and outside of the range, respectively, (p = 0.023, 95% CI 0.119, 1.618)]. Highest LBRs were seen within the range of 0.3-0.6 hMG:rFSH, [LBR of 55.4% vs. 41.4% (p = 0.010, 95% CI 0.176, 1.311)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our data supports use of 𝚫P to best predict pregnancy rates and therefore can improve clinical decision making as to when fresh ET is most appropriate. Furthermore, we found optimal gonadotropin ratios can be considered to minimize P rise and to optimize CPR/LBR, emphasizing the importance of luteinizing hormone (LH) activity in COH-IVF cycles.

Predictive models for starting dose of gonadotropin in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: review and progress update.

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is an essential for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and an important aspect of assisted reproductive technology (ART). Individual starting doses of gonadotropin (Gn) is a critical decision in the process of COH. It has a crucial impact on the number of retrieved oocytes, the cancelling rate of ART cycles, and complications such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), as well as pregnancy outcomes. How to make clinical team more standardized and accurate in determining the starting dose of Gn is an important issue in reproductive medicine. In the past 20 years, research teams worldwide have explored prediction models for Gn starting doses. With the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning, it is hoped that there will be more suitable predictive model for Gn starting dose in the future.

Real-world practices of hormone monitoring during ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: a global online survey.

Objective: The aim of this study is to understand the global practice of routine hormonal monitoring (HM) during ovarian stimulation (OS) in the context of assisted reproductive technique (ART) treatment. Methods: An open-access questionnaire was available to 3,845 members of IVF-Worldwide.com from September 8 to October 13, 2021. The survey comprised 25 multiple-choice questions on when and how ultrasound (US) and hormone tests were conducted during ovarian stimulation OS. For most questions, respondents were required to select a single option. Some questions allowed the selection of multiple options. Results: In all, 528 (13.7%) members from 88 countries responded to the questionnaire. Most respondents (98.9%) reported using US to monitor OS cycles. HM was used by 79.5% of respondents during any of the cycle monitoring visits and was most commonly performed on the day of, or a day prior to final oocyte maturation. Overall, 87% of respondents claimed adjusting the dose of gonadotropin during OS, with 61.7% adjusting the dose based on hormonal levels. Oestradiol (E2) was the most frequently monitored hormone during all visits and was used by 74% of respondents for the prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). On or a day prior to ovulation triggering (OT), the number of respondents who measured progesterone increased from 34.3% in the second/third visit to 67.7%. Approximately one-third of respondents measured luteinizing hormone during all visits. Conclusion: Globally, most ART specialists (~80%) use HM, along with US, for monitoring OS, especially for the prevention of OHSS.

Efficacies of different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols in elderly patients with poor ovarian response.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore which controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol is most suitable for elderly patients with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated clinical data from 2,660 patients from January 2017 and October 2020. The patients were divided into three groups: modified Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol (1,225 patients), GnRH antagonist protocol (1,038 patients), and Mild stimulation protocol (397 patients). Clinical variables and pregnancy outcomes were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The GnRH agonist protocol was associated with a higher number of oocyte number (3.99±2.82 vs. 3.02±1.34 vs. 2.51±1.14, p<0.001), a higher number of transferable embryos (1.39±1.32 vs. 1.24±1.24 vs. 1.18±1.11, p = 0.035), higher cumulative live birth rate [26.53% (323/1,225) vs. 22.44% (233/1,038) vs. 21.66% (86/397), p = 0.043], lower OHSS rate [5.14% (63/1,225) vs. 3.08% (32/1,038) vs. 2.02% (8/397), p = 0.005] than GnRH antagonist protocol and Mild stimulation protocol, the Mild stimulation protocol was associated with higher miscarriage rates [30.4% (24/71) vs. 25.0% (33/192) vs. 29.6% (35/168), p = 0.014] than the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The three protocols can be used in elderly patients with POR; however, if patients require more frozen-thawed embryo transfers to achieve better cumulative live birth rates, the modified GnRH agonist protocol may be the better choice. It should be emphasized that the mild stimulation had a slightly higher miscarriage rate than the other two groups.